The wrong question: “Will AI take my job?”

Every industry is grappling with the same anxiety: AI is coming for us. Accountants, designers, lawyers. Everyone sees automation as a looming replacement.

But for scientists, the question carries a special weight.

The fear is not abstract. A large share of the daily work in bioinformatics is exactly the kind of repetitive, rule-based task that AI can handle faster and more reliably. Copying files. Renaming directories. Restarting brittle pipelines. Updating notebooks for every new reference genome.

If that is how you spend your time, then yes, AI looks like it is coming for you.

Why the fear is real

Many labs still run on systems held together with sticky notes. Filenames double as metadata. Notebooks get updated by hand. Entire workflows depend on a human remembering the right order of clicks.

AI can do all of this better. That is why the fear of replacement feels so real. Because the automation we should have had years ago is finally here.

But that does not mean AI is coming for the scientist. It is coming for the sticky notes.

The difference between grunt work and science

There is a crucial distinction.

• Grunt work is keeping brittle systems alive. Dragging files, patching notebooks, copy-pasting parameters.
• Science is deciding which problems matter for humanity, recognizing patterns that connect disciplines, and daring to ask questions no dataset has imagined. This is a judgment no machine can replicate.

AI will take over the first. It will not replace the second.

The real risk is not losing science. The real risk is spending so much time on grunt work that you never get to do the science at all.

What scientists actually need from AI

The opportunity is not AI instead of bioinformaticians. It is AI plus systems that remove the fragile scaffolding from research.

That means:

• Metadata captured in structured, machine readable form
• Pipelines where steps connect automatically, not by drag-and-drop
• Environments designed for reuse, not one-off experiments taped together with sticky notes

In this world, AI does not threaten scientists. It empowers them, accelerating discovery and bringing answers faster. 

From fear to relief

The future is not AI versus bioinformaticians. It is scientists spending less time maintaining sticky note workflows and more time asking real biological questions.

AI will not replace scientists. But it will replace the unsustainable data practices that have made science feel like a second job.

And that shift is not a threat. It is the relief this field has been waiting for.

***

Foundry was built for exactly this future: structured, reproducible, AI ready workflows without sticky notes. Schedule a call and learn more.

‍